From: To: Subject: krnet Digest 3 Nov 2002 18:05:59 -0000 Issue 543 Date: Sunday, November 03, 2002 10:08 AM krnet Digest 3 Nov 2002 18:05:59 -0000 Issue 543 Topics (messages 13019 through 13035): Re: com antenna placementReply to M. Langford antenna placement 13019 by: jim wogaman 13024 by: Mark Langford KR1 warbirds 13020 by: Oscar Zuniga 13021 by: Donald Reid airfoil 13022 by: Sinisa 13025 by: Mark Langford KR Article in KITPLANES 13023 by: Phillip Matheson Expecting 13026 by: John & Elaine Roffey Re: Spruce vs otherREPLY re wood 13027 by: jim wogaman KR Flaps 13028 by: Ronevogt.aol.com 13029 by: Mark Langford 13035 by: jim wogaman belly flaps 13030 by: Darren Pond update 13031 by: Tim Brown Flpas vs Belly Board...Comments Please 13032 by: Ronevogt.aol.com Flap size 13033 by: John and Janet Martindale Paint 13034 by: Daniel Heath Administrivia: To subscribe to the digest, e-mail: To unsubscribe from the digest, e-mail: To post to the list, e-mail: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2002 11:55:35 -0500 To: "Mark Langford" From: "jim wogaman" Cc: "hennie van `rooyan" Subject: Re: KR> com antenna placementReply to M. Langford antenna placement Message-ID: <002101c281c7$80e10220$b8c429d1@jeannielobell> Mr. Langford: You are definitely a genius with great practical mind! I know many netters have learned many things from your posts. I admire and commend you. jim wogaman cleo :-) ----- Original Message ----- From: Mark Langford To: Sent: October 31, 2002 9:41 PM Subject: Re: KR> com antenna placement > Bob Smith wrote: > > >I've seen Mark's "arrow shaft" antenna design. Why bother putting one > dipole in an arrow shaft????< > > I "bothered" because the bottom leg of my dipole is out "in space" between > the bottom of the vertical stab and bottom of the fuselage. The arrow shaft > is practically weightless, dirt cheap, and took 10 seconds to insert the > copper foil tape into. The other alternative would be to magically suspend > it between those two points and wait for it to break, or make some other > support for it. I made such a support out of 2" fiberglass tape folded into > an angle, and it only weighed 1.2 ounces (see > http://home.hiwaay.net/~langford/02103005m.jpg ), but the arrow shaft was > even lighter, and about five times stiffer and offered much better abrasion > resistance if the elevator cable came into contact with it for some reason. > I didn't think it was particularly stupid to use arrow shaft at the time. > See http://home.hiwaay.net/~langford/antennas.html for more details, and a > link to RST's web site that explains all of the gory details of the copper > foil antenna. By the way, I think the best place to locate the antenna is > glued to the vertical stab's forward spar face, but I forgot to do it, so I > was forced to stick it on the surface later. > > If you must have a cable or metal near the antenna, it's best to have it > near the center, rather than the ends of the legs. > > I can't vouch for how MINE works, but a whole lot of KR builders have been > using this same setup with great results... > > Mark Langford, Huntsville, Alabama > mailto:langford@hiwaay.net > see KR2S N56ML at http://home.hiwaay.net/~langford > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To post to the list, email: krnet@mailinglists.org , NOT "reply all" > > To UNsubscribe, e-mail: krnet-unsubscribe@mailinglists.org > For additional commands, e-mail: krnet-help@mailinglists.org > > See the KRNet archives at http://www.maddyhome.com/krsrch/index.jsp > or http://www.bouyea.net/ for the Word files > ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2002 22:02:01 -0600 To: "krnet" From: "Mark Langford" Subject: Re: KR> com antenna placementReply to M. Langford antenna placement Message-ID: <001d01c28224$9b24f800$1c00a8c0@800Athlon> jim wogaman wrote: > Mr. Langford: You are definitely a genius with great practical mind! I know > many netters have learned many things from your posts. I admire and commend > you. jim wogaman I'm not all that smart. I just read a lot, file it away, ask an occasional question, and try to put the good ideas to work later on. The article that Don Reid mentioned at http://users.erols.com/donreid/sportaviation/Kr90-2.HTM is a prime example of an article from which lots of wisdom can be gained the easy way. It doesn't get any better than having somebody who's been there, done that, tell you what works and what doesn't. And the second article Don mentioned had the following quote, for all of you flap naysayers: >>Ken Rand showed up with a couple of new things - flaps on his KR-2 and an almost completed Super KR1. He told me the flaps came about as a result of his getting his Commercial license. He found he had to have a specified amount of "high performance" time logged -- "high performance" being defined as an aircraft with a constant speed propeller, retractable gear and flaps. Since he qualified on the first two counts with the KR-2, he decided to go for three by sawing off the center section trailing edge and installing slotted flaps. I don't know if he will meet the horsepower requirements for "high performance", but Ken says the flaps work fine and improve the flight characteristics of the KR-2, in any case. They allow steeper approaches and cut down on float in ground effect. Ken says he particularly enjoys being able to carry a touch of power on final, if needed -- something that would have sailed the clean little bird into the next county before flaps were installed. << So much information out there, and so few people panning for it... Mark Langford, Huntsville, AL mailto:langford@hiwaay.net see KR2S project at http://home.hiwaay.net/~langford ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2002 12:48:06 -0600 To: krnet@mailinglists.org From: "Oscar Zuniga" Subject: KR1 warbirds Message-ID: Daren wrote: >Has anyone modified a KR1/2 into a sort of warbird lookalike? >I would want to make my version into some sort of Luftwaffe-type >warbird Luftwaffe? And you are a UK-based chap? Shame on you! ;o) I know I've seen a very pretty KR fitted out to look like a Spitfire, but don't remember whose it was. I thought it might even have been Neil Bingham's, but would have to search the archives to find out. I do remember it had a somewhat military-looking cockpit, and the trim wheel sticks in my mind because that's what I'm patterning mine after (in the "KR Construction Trainer" I'm building). It's a complicated piece, very elaborate and difficult to obtain ... made from the lid from a peanut butter jar (I used a generic brand so my trim wheel wouldn't say "Skippy" on it!) Don Reid has all of the old Sport Aviation write-ups on KRs and I know I've seen this Spitfire-looking KR in one of those... which means you could easily decorate your KR to resemble a Me.109. Take a look at the cover of EAA Experimenter last month or the month before, for a picture of a Loehle 5151 dressed up like a Messerschmitt; or visit their site at http://www.loehle.com to get some ideas. Oscar Zuniga San Antonio, TX mailto: taildrags@hotmail.com website at http://www.flysquirrel.net _________________________________________________________________ Get a speedy connection with MSN Broadband.  Join now! http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/freeactivation.asp ------------------------------ Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2002 16:08:37 -0500 To: krnet@mailinglists.org From: Donald Reid Subject: Re: KR> KR1 warbirds Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.0.20021101160614.00a324c0@pop.erols.com> --=====================_814181==_.ALT Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed At 12:48 PM 11/1/2002 -0600, Oscar Zuniga wrote: >Daren wrote: >>Has anyone modified a KR1/2 into a sort of warbird lookalike? >>I would want to make my version into some sort of Luftwaffe-type >>warbird > >Don Reid has all of the old Sport Aviation write-ups on KRs and I know >I've seen this Spitfire-looking KR in one of those... The one that you are thinking about is http://users.erols.com/donreid/sportaviation/Kr90-2.HTM and it looks slightly British. There is also a Mustang-ish looking one at http://users.erols.com/donreid/sportaviation/Photos.HTM Don Reid mailto:donreid@erols.com Bumpass, Va Visit my web sites at: KR2XL construction: http://users.erols.com/donreid/kr_page.htm Aviation Surplus: http://users.erols.com/donreid/Airparts.htm EAA Chapter 231: http://eaa231.org Ultralights: http://usua250.org VA EAA State Fly-in: http://vaeaa.org --=====================_814181==_.ALT-- ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2002 00:48:25 +0100 To: From: "Sinisa" Subject: airfoil Message-ID: <009d01c28201$33d6f9a0$05321dc3@vlasta> ------=_NextPart_000_009A_01C28209.8D10CC00 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1250" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable hello, Has anyone of you (or you may know someone) built and fly kr 1 = using a "new" airfoil AS5045...? =20 Considering Reinolds number, I wander will this suit?... b.r. sinisa ------=_NextPart_000_009A_01C28209.8D10CC00-- ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2002 08:21:03 -0600 To: From: "Mark Langford" Subject: Re: KR> airfoil Message-ID: <00f701c2827b$14195cf0$0100a8c0@TD310> Sinisa wrote: >hello, Has anyone of you (or you may know someone) built and fly kr 1 using a "new" airfoil AS5045...? Considering Reinolds number, I wander will this suit?...< The way I figure it, if the AS5046 is a suitable replacement for the RAF48 on a KR2 or KR2S, it should be a suitable replacement for the RAF48 on the KR1 as well. People who build KR1's usually have speed as their number one goal, so I'd think the AS5046 would be a natural choice. Certainly the AS5046 is no worse a choice than the RAF48. Having said that, I'm not entirely sure what a KR1 wing even looks like. Doesn't it have almost exactly the same planform as the KR2? What are the root and tip chords, and the distance between them, and overall wing length from outer template to outer template? Mark Langford, Huntsville, Alabama mailto:langford@hiwaay.net see KR2S N56ML at http://home.hiwaay.net/~langford ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2002 11:30:01 +1100 To: "krnet listing" From: "Phillip Matheson" Subject: KR Article in KITPLANES Message-ID: <001a01c28206$ffb8a1e0$0100a8c0@barry> ------=_NextPart_000_0017_01C28263.2FB8AB40 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable This is an old KITPLANES, but if you can find a copy, it is well worth = reading KITPLANES July 1988 Building and Flying the KRs: Those Inexpensive , High - Performance Composites 16 pages of stories and pictures , Article headings - Meet Jeannette Rand - Talk About a KR - KR Builders - The KR-2: How Does It Fly - Kr's Flying in Europe Stories about building and the builders, including Dan Diehl Neil D. Biingham Roger Hansen Charles Powell=20 and many others The story on Jeannette Rand talks about the early days with Ken Rand and = Stuart Robinson, including Ken's Crash. The KR-3 two place amphibian ( dudded the "Spruce Gosling" first flown = in 1977. I found a photo copy of the KITPLANES KR articles in the paperwork I got = when I picked up my incomplete KR2. Phil Matheson matheson@dodo.com.au 61 3 58833588 NSW Australia. See our VW engines at; www.vw-engines.com ------=_NextPart_000_0017_01C28263.2FB8AB40-- ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2002 09:49:13 -0500 To: "KR Mailing Lists" From: "John & Elaine Roffey" Subject: Expecting Message-ID: <001e01c2827f$03ba6580$142b3b41@default> ------=_NextPart_000_001B_01C28255.19F1C020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sorry for the Saturday morning post off subject fellow netters, last = night was a late one, but I had my ship come in yesterday and I am = hoping to get back into my shop and on my project on a more regular = basis. On April 5th 1999, I was transferred to a new group formed within our = company to travel from plant to plant doing major turbine and boiler = overhauls. The schedule was ten hour days six or seven days a week form = labor day through memorial day and smaller projects on other plant = equipment during the summer months.=20 Needles to say there wasn't much progress on my KR. I didn't have time = to do the things I was supposed to do, let alone the things that I = wanted to do. I even hired my grass cut. What the ship brought in for me yesterday, November 1st 2002 was a = promotion to Reliability Supervisor in one plant.=20 I will be in one place taking care of one crew and one section of the = facility. The plant is thirty five minutes from home and there will be some = overtime required but not a lot. I look forward to this new assignment and getting back to my KR, and my = life. Thanks for listening (reading) fellow netters, you kept me going and = kept me hoping. John Roffey Back in the KR business. ------=_NextPart_000_001B_01C28255.19F1C020-- ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2002 12:41:40 -0500 To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Eduardo_Jos=E9_Jankosz?= From: "jim wogaman" Cc: "hennie van `rooyan" Subject: Re: KR> Spruce vs otherREPLY re wood Message-ID: <004f01c28297$1b4d0460$75c429d1@jeannielobell> Eduardo: I used to exchange emails with a man from BZil. He was interested in building KRs. He like most of us seemed short onmoney. He could not afford spruce. He had researched local wood of SA. He found a wood with superior properties to spruse. Inexpensive, easy to shape, strong, light, etc. I believe it grew in the tropical rain forest. If I can find his email or snail mail address, I'll send same to you. I sent him a copy of KR documentation. You take care and good building to you. jim wogaman cleo :-) ----- Original Message ----- From: Eduardo José Jankosz To: krnet Sent: November 01, 2002 5:39 AM Subject: Re: KR> Spruce vs other > Hennie? > > This Saligna does not would be a specimen of Eucalyptus (natural from > Austrália)? I know Eucalyptus saligna, a tree with a thick skin and a red > wood! > Is this? > > > Thank you!!!!! > > > Eduardo José Jankosz > jankosz@bsi.com.br > http://www.bsi.com.br/cbcb > http://br.groups.yahoo.com/group/kr2-brasil > Curitiba - PR - BRASIL > > ---------- > > De: van Rooyen, Hennie(SF02) > > Para: 'krnet@mailinglists.org' > > Assunto: RE: KR> Spruce vs other > > Data: Quinta-feira, 31 de Outubro de 2002 03:15 > > > > Hi Pedro, > > > > In South Africa the use of either Saligna (I don't know if this is what > it's > > called over there, but it is the kind of wood that's mostly used for > > scaffold planking) or clear Origon is legal and also widely used in > > homebuilt aircraft construction - hope this helps. > > > > Hennie > > > > > > > > > > "I am located at Venezuela, and in fact it´s too difficult to obtain > > spruce here. On the other hand, Caribean Pine and other species are > > abundant here. > > > > Do anyone knows about the use of other wood species different to spuce > > in structural parts for KR2 plane?. Some recommendation?. > > > > Pedro Pinzon > > Puerto la Cruz" > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To post to the list, email: krnet@mailinglists.org , NOT "reply all" > > > > To UNsubscribe, e-mail: krnet-unsubscribe@mailinglists.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: krnet-help@mailinglists.org > > > > See the KRNet archives at http://www.maddyhome.com/krsrch/index.jsp > > or http://www.bouyea.net/ for the Word files > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To post to the list, email: krnet@mailinglists.org , NOT "reply all" > > To UNsubscribe, e-mail: krnet-unsubscribe@mailinglists.org > For additional commands, e-mail: krnet-help@mailinglists.org > > See the KRNet archives at http://www.maddyhome.com/krsrch/index.jsp > or http://www.bouyea.net/ for the Word files > ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2002 13:59:27 EST To: krnet@mailinglists.org From: Ronevogt@aol.com Subject: KR Flaps Message-ID: <147.1cc204b.2af57a8f@aol.com> --part1_147.1cc204b.2af57a8f_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit When I started building my KR-2S, I was told that the flap system on the KR was ineffective. At that time, (2 1/2 years ago), the trend seemed to be to leave the flaps off and instead install a belly board. I saw three different designs in old KR Newsletters. They all had one thing in common: size. The differences were all in the deployment system. Therefore, I stayed with the common size...and designed my own deployment system. I haven't flown my airplane yet, but the belly board apparently does a good job of slowing the airplane down and makes approaches with a lower nose attitude possible. I would appreciate comments on the topic. THX Ron Vogt --part1_147.1cc204b.2af57a8f_boundary-- ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2002 14:55:44 -0600 To: "KRnet" From: "Mark Langford" Subject: Re: KR> KR Flaps Message-ID: <011301c282b2$3669d410$0100a8c0@TD310> Ron Vogt wrote: > They all had one thing in common: size. The > differences were all in the deployment system. Therefore, I stayed with the > common size...and designed my own deployment system. I haven't flown my > airplane yet, but the belly board apparently does a good job of slowing the > airplane down and makes approaches with a lower nose attitude possible. I > would appreciate comments on the topic. I think the only reason KR flaps are the size they are is because they were designed into the "stock" KR with the original retracts. Any longer than 5 inches and they would have dragged the ground! And obviously the length is determined by the max length of the stub wing. I suspect that if Ken had been using Diehl gear, those flaps would have been substantially larger, and a lot more useful. There is always mention that if you know how to slip a plane, flaps are unnecessary. But my reply to that is that even if flaps were completely useless for anything else, their drag will help to get you out of ground effect and planted on the runway and slowed down faster on this slick little plane that sits so low to the ground. That's why I chose the draggiest kind of flaps (and made them big), the split flap (see http://home.hiwaay.net/~langford/99101051.jpg ). And yes, a belly board does a great job of that too With the excess power that I'll have, I'm not too worried about sucking up the flaps for a go-around. In other news, I'm getting dangerously close to throwing a coat of paint on the bottom of my plane. I've decided to wait on the fancy paint job until later, opting instead to shoot some urethane primer (Ultimate 2k) on the whole plane, which can be done piece-meal until the whole plane is protected, without too much concern for stray dust. Then I can test fly it and make changes later if required, or just test different mods (like wingtips) to see what effect they have. If I get oil all over the bottom of the plane, it can be easily cleaned off, then the whole plane can be painted with a nice coat of Imron, at my leisure. Right now I'm doing last minute filling and a little sanding, and I'll be ready to paint the whole bottom! Mark Langford, Huntsville, Alabama mailto:langford@hiwaay.net see KR2S N56ML at http://home.hiwaay.net/~langford ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2002 12:41:40 -0500 To: "Mark Langford" From: "jim wogaman" Cc: "hennie van `rooyan" Subject: Re: KR> KR Flaps Message-ID: <002601c28360$469898e0$27491cd8@jeannielobell> Mark: My older brother was a very skilled pilot. He always said slower speed is preferred to required "slipping" because slipping is dependent upon pilot skill. Flaps there only dependent upon useing them. Proper design/size assumed. Good luck painting, testing and flying. jim w cleo :-) ----- Original Message ----- From: Mark Langford To: KRnet Sent: November 02, 2002 3:55 PM Subject: Re: KR> KR Flaps > Ron Vogt wrote: > > > They all had one thing in common: size. The > > differences were all in the deployment system. Therefore, I stayed with > the > > common size...and designed my own deployment system. I haven't flown my > > airplane yet, but the belly board apparently does a good job of slowing > the > > airplane down and makes approaches with a lower nose attitude possible. I > > would appreciate comments on the topic. > > I think the only reason KR flaps are the size they are is because they were > designed into the "stock" KR with the original retracts. Any longer than 5 > inches and they would have dragged the ground! And obviously the length is > determined by the max length of the stub wing. I suspect that if Ken had > been using Diehl gear, those flaps would have been substantially larger, and > a lot more useful. > > There is always mention that if you know how to slip a plane, flaps are > unnecessary. But my reply to that is that even if flaps were completely > useless for anything else, their drag will help to get you out of ground > effect and planted on the runway and slowed down faster on this slick little > plane that sits so low to the ground. That's why I chose the draggiest kind > of flaps (and made them big), the split flap (see > http://home.hiwaay.net/~langford/99101051.jpg ). And yes, a belly board > does a great job of that too With the excess power that I'll have, I'm not > too worried about sucking up the flaps for a go-around. > > In other news, I'm getting dangerously close to throwing a coat of paint on > the bottom of my plane. I've decided to wait on the fancy paint job until > later, opting instead to shoot some urethane primer (Ultimate 2k) on the > whole plane, which can be done piece-meal until the whole plane is > protected, without too much concern for stray dust. Then I can test fly it > and make changes later if required, or just test different mods (like > wingtips) to see what effect they have. If I get oil all over the bottom of > the plane, it can be easily cleaned off, then the whole plane can be painted > with a nice coat of Imron, at my leisure. > > Right now I'm doing last minute filling and a little sanding, and I'll be > ready to paint the whole bottom! > > Mark Langford, Huntsville, Alabama > mailto:langford@hiwaay.net > see KR2S N56ML at http://home.hiwaay.net/~langford > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To post to the list, email: krnet@mailinglists.org , NOT "reply all" > > To UNsubscribe, e-mail: krnet-unsubscribe@mailinglists.org > For additional commands, e-mail: krnet-help@mailinglists.org > > See the KRNet archives at http://www.maddyhome.com/krsrch/index.jsp > or http://www.bouyea.net/ for the Word files > ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2002 16:23:50 -0500 To: From: "Darren Pond" Subject: belly flaps Message-ID: HI All My new to me 375 hour KR2 did have a belly board on it but was removed as he suggested it disturbed the air over the tail. I'm waiting to visit the original owner to find out the details. He also had wing tips but removed them as it increase the floating in ground effect. Instead this kr2 has flaperons with three positions. I don't have the wings on yet to figure out the position and there relationships but the last two owners did enjoy what this offered. No flaps on this bird. Empty weight is suggested to be 550# on the 1835vw. I for one would like either flaps if this was new bird to add a working belly board. As this has the original gear on it I would like hear from an owner that still fly's them in this configuration. No wheel fairs either as he suggested it made no difference in cruise and stayed in ground effect longer. Darren Pond CF-VML Taylor Mono plane almost flying. C-GGGW KR2 1835vw coming to a airport near you this spring PondHopper 2 place 2.2 turbo (building stage) Cambridge Ont Canada pond27@rogers.com ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2002 15:50:44 -0800 (PST) To: Group KR NET From: Tim Brown Subject: update Message-ID: <20021102235044.83671.qmail@web40902.mail.yahoo.com> Netters: For the past four months my bird has been belly up. During that time I've foamed and glassed the stubs, got the gear mounted, run the brake lines, installed my belly board and, for the past two months, sanded and filled (micro) to get everything baby bottom smooth (guess Mark J knows that feel by now). Just came in from sanding all day and just put what I hope to be the last itty bitty amount of micro here and there. Also squeezed in winterizing the boat inasmuch as we have been below 30 nearly every night for a couple weeks here. I noted Mark L's latest post re what priming his bottom (or at least his plane's). I was maybe thinking of using Smooth Prime now on the bottom while she's belly side up staying away from every place where additional glass or work will be done (ie near the firewall and leading edges). Any thoughts? Tomorrow...boat goes in storage down the hill (I live in the mountains) and garage gets a good cleaning to remove most of the 2 months of micro dust. Tim __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? HotJobs - Search new jobs daily now http://hotjobs.yahoo.com/ ------------------------------ Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2002 21:34:10 EST To: krnet@mailinglists.org From: Ronevogt@aol.com Subject: Flpas vs Belly Board...Comments Please Message-ID: <6e.257a4485.2af5e522@aol.com> ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2002 21:18:33 +1100 To: "KRnet" From: "John and Janet Martindale" Subject: Flap size Message-ID: <004c01c28322$780adde0$cade12d2@m1g0x7> ------=_NextPart_000_0049_01C2837E.90EF1220 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Folks Just a quick one on flap size learn't the hard way. Make sure your = ground clearance is sufficient when either you have a flat tyre or a = heavy landing. These little instances are particularly good at sanding = down flap trailing edges and prop tips. I know, I did it a month back. C'est la vie. =20 John and Janet Martindale 29 Jane Circuit TOORMINA NSW 2452 AUSTRALIA ph: 61 2 66584767 ------=_NextPart_000_0049_01C2837E.90EF1220-- ------------------------------ Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2002 06:39:45 -0800 (Pacific Standard Time) To: "krnet@mailinglists.org" From: "Daniel Heath" Subject: Paint Message-Id: <3DC53531.00000C.01016@dan> --------------Boundary-00=_9Q807TH0000000000000 Content-Type: Multipart/Alternative; boundary="------------Boundary-00=_9Q8024L0000000000000" --------------Boundary-00=_9Q8024L0000000000000 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable We are getting ready to paint the bottom of the plane. I have use Dupont Centari in the past, but it seems that the Randolf paints are not quite a= s expensive. It seems that we can use Laquer, Enamel, or Urethane.=0D =0D Do any of you have a preferance for paints and primers?=0D See ya in Red Oak --- 2003,=0D =0D Daniel R. Heath=0D =0D See our KR2 at: http://kr-builder.org Click on the Pic.=0D =0D See our EAA Chapter 242 at: http://WWW.EAA242.ORG=0D =0D =20 --------------Boundary-00=_9Q8024L0000000000000 Content-Type: Text/HTML; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
We are getting ready to paint the bottom of the plane.  I= have=20 use Dupont Centari in the past, but it seems that the Randolf paint= s are=20 not quite as expensive.  It seems that we can use Laquer, Enam= el, or=20 Urethane.
 
Do any of you have a preferance for paints and primers?

See ya in Red Oak --- 2003,

Da= niel R.=20 Heath

See our KR2 at: http://kr-builder.org  Clic= k on the=20 Pic.

See our EAA Chapter 242 at: http://WWW.EAA242.ORG

&nb= sp;=20

=09 =09 =09 =09 =09 =09 =09
____________________________________________________
  IncrediMai= l -=20 Email has finally evolved - Click=20 Here --------------Boundary-00=_9Q8024L0000000000000-- --------------Boundary-00=_9Q807TH0000000000000-- ------------------------------ End of krnet Digest ***********************************