From: krnet-bounces@mylist.net To: John Bouyea Subject: KRnet Digest, Vol 346, Issue 158 Date: 10/10/2004 8:59:32 PM Send KRnet mailing list submissions to krnet@mylist.net To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://mylist.net/listinfo/krnet or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to krnet-request@mylist.net You can reach the person managing the list at krnet-owner@mylist.net When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of KRnet digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Aerodynamic counterweight vs pitch sensitivity (Mark Youkey) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2004 22:41:33 -0500 From: "Mark Youkey" Subject: KR> Aerodynamic counterweight vs pitch sensitivity To: "KR builders and pilots" Message-ID: <008e01c4af44$33e5c670$6500a8c0@blah> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" I've noticed a few trends in KR cyberspace. One trend consisted of many people trying to do everything they could to reduce pitch sensitivity, and now I've noticed a trend of many people using aerodynamic counterweights. Although both of these efforts seem productive, and make sense on their own, do they make sense together? I probably don't understand the intent of the builders who have talked about doing both at the same time on their websites. Any comments? I'm getting close to starting on my tail section. A wise guy (wiser than me, that's for sure) here in OK told me that you should always ask how people would do it, listen to them, then do it your own way. Thanks. Mark Youkey myoukey@cox.net Oklahoma City ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ See KRnet list details at http://www.krnet.org/instructions.html End of KRnet Digest, Vol 346, Issue 158 *************************************** ================================== ABC Amber Outlook Converter v4.20 Trial version ==================================